A few weeks ago I was in a meeting with a prospective client. At the end of the conversation, the chief marketing officer said, “I see you don’t refer to yourselves as PR pros… and your proposal doesn’t have any mention of it. Why is that?”
I explained that when people say they need a PR firm, they really mean they want someone to get them stories, which is an ego-driven metric, and only one tactic of a larger marketing and communications program.
Even though we were ending the meeting when she asked, we ended up talking for another 45 minutes about this new world we live in and what public relations really does for an organization. Which is much more than you think.
What is PR anyway?
The PR industry has, for a very long time, used media relations as the example when describing what we do because it’s tangible. Just like you can hold or view an ad, you can hold or view a story a reporter has written or produced.
But while media relations is fantastic for brand awareness and credibility, it doesn’t drive business results unless it’s integrated with other tactics.
And using media relations as “the thing” the industry does is doing us a huge disservice.
There are many other tactics we use: crisis planning, monitoring and listening, issues management, messaging, creating and telling stories, speaking engagements, content development, events, guerilla marketing, internal communication, social media, lobbying, audits, market research, community development, influencer relations, blogger relations, word of mouth, contests, trends development and more.
Some of us even integrate what might be considered more traditional marketing: e-mail, database development, search engine optimization, trade shows, search engine marketing, inbound marketing, gamification and mobile technology.
When you combine tactics such as these, you have an integrated marketing and communications program that drives results – real results such as improved margins, shortened sales cycles and increased revenues.
Self-hating PR professionals
But even the new definition of PR that the Public Relations Society of America announced earlier this year doesn’t help the industry:
Public relations is a strategic communication process that builds mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their publics.
It continues to refer to media relations as the only tactic in a communicator’s toolbox. It’s like saying you have to build a house with only one hammer.
So the industry has begun to see a move toward other descriptors of what we do (social media, marketing, integrated marketing communications). Meanwhile, many of us have stopped saying we do PR.
I grew up in a traditional PR firm but I’ve been smart enough to realize organizations will pay for your relationships with journalists only for so long. They soon want to know what’s next and how those relationships will help them grow a business.
That’s something most PR pros don’t know because it requires an understanding of how an organization makes money, the difference between a balance sheet and a P&L, and how margins affect profitability.
Those are things we’re not taught in school. And, unless you run the PR firm or start your own, the closest you’ll get in your career is managing a budget.
Let’s all go to business school
The fact of the matter is, PR pros need a business education. The major needs to move from the liberal arts college to the business school or at least require some business classes before graduation.
Sure, most PR pros are right brained. It’s essential to be creative enough to tell stories in compelling ways, to provide valuable information that helps others do their jobs, and to build relationships on behalf of organizations.
But the PR pro of tomorrow has to fight the black eye and learn everything they can about the business side of things. Otherwise they’ll always be known as media relations specialists. And that’s just not enough anymore.




Oh Gini, my dear friend, thank you dearly for the link mention. It’s certainly easy to get caught up in those ego-driven metrics of social shares, comments. press mentions and the like, but as you and others have taught me, it’s all ethereal unless it does something to move the needle business-wise.
Media relations is certainly valuable. Just not by itself.
I worry that the shift away from the term “PR” is a missed opportunity. PR is — as PRSA notes — about “relationships” with our “publics.” The problem is that we’ve fallen into the habit of assuming “public” means reporter.
But don’t want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Where we’re really falling down the “relationship” part. Too many brands are just throwing content on Facebook without thinking about building a relationship. Too many bloggers receive too many cold-call pitches asking for something. And there is too much focus on output — tweets written, names on a media list, etc. — and too little on outcomes.
What I’m hoping for is a return of the PR pro as master relationship-builder, someone who can use the amazing digital tools we now have to build strong, sustainable relationships, and someone who can use those relationships to further business goals by bringing stakeholders together.
“Relationship-building” not a sexy concept, and it’s not particularly scalable (if it’s being done right). But in an era where there’s a lot more noise than signal, it’s pretty much the only way forward.
I agree with you, Brian. It seems those relationships are even more important today than they’ve been in the past. But they’re not the *only* thing we should be doing. We’re the best storytellers; why doesn’t content creation and email marketing belong to us? We understand those relationships so why doesn’t engagement belong to us? Sure, there is a big blurring of lines between marketing and PR right now – and I definitely advocate PR pros learn how to measure effectiveness from marketing – but we also should own some of these other things.
Gini, I usually love your perspective, but I really struggle to see anything new in this post. It’s essentially an argument for PR to take its proper place within the marketing mix’s Promotion category. I think that was in my Intro Marketing textbook in 1999. Is this really a big problem for anyone not coasting into retirement?
Maybe our PR folks are more strategic by nature in Canada than in the US (you can ask your Inside PR podcast colleagues about that) but if you go to a CPRS or IABC Canada conference, I think it would be a challenge to find any corporate/institutional manager or higher level PR pro who hasn’t internalized this long ago.
Now that I think about it, the CPRS definition of PR, in my opinion, better captured the essence of the field:
“Public relations is the strategic management of relationships between an organization and its diverse publics, through the use of communication, to achieve mutual understanding, realize organizational goals and serve the public interest.”
Sure, there are publicists, creative writers, bloggers, etc who don’t think about this stuff, but honestly, not everyone in every company has to be strategic every single day. Sometimes, they just need to do what’s expected of them, because they tend to report to someone who has a better understanding of the organization’s goals (hopefully because they’re active in helping set them.) Then again, I’m a fan of the seemingly lost art of following, the absence of which I think costs a lot more to an organization stuck in endless strategy meetings with entry-level employees, instead of moving forward with their marketing/PR plans.
Unfortunately, Everett, this isn’t an issue just for those coasting into retirement. As a blogger, I also get pitched from PR pros and it is horrendous. They’re just checking a box on their to-do list so they’re able to tell clients they pitched so and so blogger and so and so journalist. After all, it’s not their fault if the blogger or journalist doesn’t do anything with the story.
That said, I don’t think entry-level people need to be stuck in strategy meetings. I was a good 10 years into my career before I fully grasped strategy and how what I was doing every day affected the growth of a business.
My concern is most agencies (maybe not on the corporate side) worry about tactics and not strategy. Those are the people I’m talking to. And, I agree with you, the CPRS definition of PR is much better…it’s more than just publicity we’re doing and that definition speaks to that.
Sorry – I’ll add one more thing: The prospects (and even some clients) we’re talking to don’t get this. They don’t get we’re more than media relations. Their perception (no matter how wrong it is) is they’re going to hire a PR firm (or pro) and they’re going to see their name in ink all over the place and their sales are going to increase dramatically. That’s why I related the story at the beginning of the blog post. It’s not about that. And it’s rare a media relations program will increase your sales or make the phone ring…by itself.
Agreed on all counts, Gini. People on the corporate side are very tactics driven, too, although perhaps less so around social media and events, and more around producing endless content. The result is a lot of information overload for most of the employees in their companies and stakeholders in their external communities. But I do sense that, increasingly, comms directors are more accountable to answer the question from the CEO or the Board: “What exactly am I paying you to accomplish here?” p.s. I wish there was a way to make every person who puts ‘PR’ on their resume read those definitions and explain how it applies to their work. I suspect we’d see a big drop in the number of people promoting themselves that way.
It’s funny you say that. I was just having a conversation with a friend who is NOT a communications professional, but he’s been asked to do online reputation management because he knows how to use Twitter and Facebook to build a community. He was asking for my advice and it was everything I could do not to strangle him. Reputation management – online or off – takes experience and expertise. It’s not for the social media “expert” who knows how to use Twitter. That stuff drives me freaking insane.
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/Ol1vElHU
#sparksheet From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/bAlrwwUN
The line between marketing, business analysis and #PR is blurring: Why it's a good thing. http://t.co/G82sC9k7 via @Sparksheet
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/exYTUbdB
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/SQGVnCMJ
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/SQGVnCMJ
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business | Sparksheet: http://t.co/rfObl0ug
RT @ginidietrich: From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business | Sparksheet: http://t.co/OzVXSCIo
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business | Sparksheet: http://t.co/rfObl0ug
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business | Sparksheet: http://t.co/YjckkpNz What's in your toolbox?
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Go to Business School http://t.co/u1h86c90
From Spin to Win: Why #PR Needs to Get Down to Business – http://t.co/uPfe8GGA via @Sparksheet @ginidietrich
From Spin to Win: Why #PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/LzHWpl4b #prspin
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/s8y34brm
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/VmmYHWtf RT @sparksheet
Getting PR down to business http://t.co/seBgjE55
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business | Sparksheet: http://t.co/1mCuuGaD via @sparksheet #PR
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/WM539ZG6
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/WM539ZG6
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business http://t.co/WM539ZG6
Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business @ SparkSheet http://t.co/qX8K8CYa
@GiniDietrich says: From Spin to Win: Why #PR Needs to Get Down to Business #publicrelations http://t.co/md8x3DX8
WELL SAID @EverettMartin! Push back on the "confirmation bias" #PR people. http://t.co/rsyzOEOK
From Spin to Win: Why PR Needs to Get Down to Business, via @sparksheet http://t.co/LFUZDT0c
[...] How do PR professionals change their industry’s reputation from spin zone to profit centre? By breaking out of the media relations box and going back to business school, suggests CEO and author Gini Dietrich. [...]
From Spin to Win: Why PR needs to get down to business. http://t.co/aufkWsZi
@ThePaulSutton did you check out the comments on a non-confirmation bias/non-blog-commenting community site? http://t.co/yJlZ5j1c